my 2 cents on this as I do customer documents and business plans. If you need to validate information in Gamma then we need gamma to provide a means to cross check. However, gamma is not designed for that per se. Given that I get into trouble if I don't validate every assertion I use a combination of perplexity with either ChatGPT or Claude to do my research. Perplexity does great fact checking on ChatGPT and Claude. Once I have fact checking done I then take the final output to Gamma. Another thing you could do is work on the basis that all informaton is valid. Finalize your work. Output to pdf and then take to Perplexity and ask it to validate the data, assertions and extrapolations. Not ideal but at least you will feel more comfortable moving forward. Perplexity is more stable. I have written multiple books and deeply concerned about fact checking with ChatGPT. Claude is slightly better but perplexity is much better. However, click on the reference and check yourself. Good luck.
.png)
%20(1).png){kind=avatar}
